Precise answers for security, legal, and procurement.
Everything a vendor review needs on one page: controls, residency boundaries, AI Act context, and the materials your review teams can request — stated plainly, without sovereignty theatre.
Built for review under European frameworks.
NeuroCluster supports evaluation against the frameworks regulated European buyers actually review — with evidence, not implied compliance.
GDPR
EU data protection
EU AI Act
Risk-based AI obligations
NIS2
Network & information security
DORA
Financial operational resilience
ISO 27001
Security management context
Security controls security teams can review.
Identity-bound actions, tenant isolation, encryption, secrets management, and incident response — with certification status stated plainly.
Security reviewers should see what NeuroCluster controls, what the customer controls, and what evidence is available — achieved certifications, in-progress audits, and planned assurance work stated without shortcuts.
Platform controls include OIDC/SSO, RBAC, tenant-scoped data access, Vault-backed secrets, audit logging, and network isolation for agent sandboxes. Certification status is shared during procurement review: achieved, in progress, planned, and available-on-request evidence. We do not imply completion before evidence exists.
- Identity-bound actions (OIDC / SSO)
- Tenant-scoped data access + RBAC
- Vault-backed secrets management
- Firecracker sandbox isolation
Data residency starts with explicit boundaries.
Hosting location, contracting context, subprocessors, and operating responsibilities — reviewed before production, not assumed.
Regulated buyers need more than a hosting location. They need to understand the contracting entity, selected deployment model, operational access, subprocessors, and what data may move across the chosen boundary.
NeuroCluster documents those assumptions during the assessment and procurement review so security and legal teams can evaluate the actual workflow rather than rely on broad sovereignty claims.
- Contracting and jurisdiction context
- Deployment boundary by model
- Subprocessor assumptions
- Data-flow review before production
AI Act readiness is workflow specific.
Controls and evidence that help teams review AI Act obligations. Final obligations depend on role, sector, and use case.
The EU AI Act separates systems by risk and assigns obligations based on role and use case. Some workflows may require documentation, logging, human oversight, or conformity processes beyond the platform itself.
NeuroCluster helps teams implement reviewable operating models with workflow logs, human review points, role boundaries, and documentation exports that support legal and security evaluation.
Procurement materials for a serious vendor review.
Request the materials security, legal, and procurement teams need to evaluate NeuroCluster before a production deployment decision.
Regulated AI buyers need more than a feature demo. They need contracting path, deployment model, operational controls, data responsibilities, and evidence for review.
The procurement pack supports that process. It does not replace customer-side legal, security, or sector-specific assessment — it gives those teams a concrete starting point.
- Company and contracting overview
- Deployment model summary and responsibility matrix
- Security controls and subprocessor summary
- Data residency and jurisdiction documentation
- Certification status and pen-test roadmap
- Incident response overview
- AI governance controls and customer responsibilities
- Architecture diagram and model/tool/data boundary overview
Start the vendor review.
Get the procurement pack, or plan an assessment where we document deployment boundaries, controls, and responsibilities for your specific workflow.