Research

Energy-awareAIcompute

AI workloads are becoming a material electrical load at exactly the moment European grids are most constrained. That makes energy an input to the scheduling decision rather than a line item after it.

Isometric line drawing of wind turbines and solar panels feeding a substation and a datacenter hall, with the power flow highlighted in blue.

Theschedulingdecision

Grid and site signals inform a placement decision, bounded by workload criticality. Work a person is waiting on is never traded against price.

Energy-aware compute
Scheduling that treats energy as an input to the placement decision.
Grid signalInputs to the scheduling decision
Energy priceGrid constraint signalTemperatureBattery stateWorkload criticalityCompute availability

Orchestration

Workload criticality decides what may be deferred. Governed work that a person is waiting on is never traded against price.

Scheduling actionWhat the orchestrator does with the workload
RunExecute now at full rate.
DeferHold non-urgent work for a cheaper or cleaner window.
MigrateMove the workload to another site or region.
ThrottleReduce concurrency to stay inside a power envelope.
CurtailStop discretionary work entirely.
This describes the target architecture. See the status section below for what is implemented today versus under research.

Thepremise

Not all compute is equally urgent. An operator waiting for a decision needs an answer now. A nightly re-embedding job, a batch evaluation run, a model fine-tune or a large back-population does not care whether it happens at two in the afternoon or three in the morning — but the grid does, and so does the electricity bill.

Once a scheduler knows which workloads are deferrable and by how long, energy price and grid conditions become legitimate inputs to placement. At sufficient scale, deferrable compute starts to look like a grid asset: a load that can be shifted, reduced or moved between locations in response to conditions.

The reason this is on the infrastructure section rather than in a sustainability statement is that it is an engineering problem with a governance dimension, and it only works if workload criticality is modelled honestly.

Whatisreal,andwhatisnotyet

This is a differentiated direction and it is early. The distinction below is the point of the page.

  • Workload classification

    Available

    Declaring which workloads are interactive, deferrable or discretionary, with a maximum acceptable delay per class.

  • Priority and preemption

    Available

    Scheduling policy that protects interactive work and preempts discretionary work under capacity pressure.

  • Spend and budget control

    Available

    Enforced cost ceilings per workload and per period, which is the crude form of the same idea.

  • Price-aware scheduling

    In development

    Shifting deferrable work towards cheaper or cleaner windows using forward price and carbon-intensity signals.

  • Thermal-aware placement

    Research

    Using site temperature and cooling headroom as a placement input rather than only as an alarm.

  • Battery and on-site generation

    Research

    Incorporating storage state and local generation into the decision.

  • Grid constraint response

    Research

    Responding to distribution-level constraint signals by curtailing or migrating discretionary compute.

  • Demand-response participation

    Strategic direction

    Treating deferrable compute as a dispatchable resource in a flexibility market.

Energy-aware scheduling is easy to describe and hard to do without degrading service. Anything on this page marked research or direction has not been demonstrated in a customer environment, and we will not describe it as though it has.

Questions

Will this delay work our operators depend on?
No. Interactive and governed work with a person waiting is never deferred. Only workloads explicitly classified as deferrable or discretionary are eligible, and the maximum delay is declared per class.
Is this a sustainability feature or a cost feature?
Both, and they mostly point the same way, because cheap windows and low-carbon windows correlate on European grids. Where they diverge, which one to optimise is a policy choice you make rather than one we make for you.
Does this require your own datacenter?
No. Classification, priority and budget control apply in any posture today. The signal-driven parts benefit from more control over the facility, which is one of the reasons the infrastructure direction and this research are connected.
Available
In production use today.
In development
Being built now. Not yet generally deployable.
Planned
On the roadmap. Not yet in development.
Research
Under investigation in Labs. May not become a product.
Strategic direction
Intent, not a delivery commitment.

Bring us one operational problem.

You do not need a finished brief. Bring the problem — we will work out the next step together.

Or book a call with the team