Trust / AI governance
Governance mechanisms, mapped to framework expectations
Most AI governance frameworks ask for the same handful of things in different vocabularies. This page maps what the platform does onto what they ask for.
Common expectations and supporting mechanisms
Framework-neutral, because the underlying expectations converge even where the terminology does not.
| Expectation | Supporting mechanism | What you still have to do |
|---|---|---|
| Inventory of AI systems | Registered agents and models with owners, purposes and mandates | Decide scope and keep ownership current |
| Risk classification | Risk level per workflow, driving approval and evidence depth | Define the classification scheme for your context |
| Human oversight | Approval routing by object ownership, with the case assembled and reasoning recorded | Staff the oversight roles with people who can exercise them |
| Data governance | Access-aware retrieval, scoped permissions, lineage and residency enforcement | Establish lawful basis and retention policy |
| Technical documentation | Versioned policies, mappings, prompts and model registrations with change history | Assemble and maintain the documentation set |
| Record keeping | Evidence records per decision, including model and policy version in force | Set retention periods and review cadence |
| Accuracy and robustness | Task-specific evaluation suites and regression tests as lifecycle gates | Define acceptable thresholds for your use cases |
| Transparency to affected people | Recorded reasoning and citations that can be surfaced in your own processes | Decide what is disclosed, to whom, and how |
| Incident handling | Detection, kill switches, evidence for investigation, degradation behaviour | Own the process and any notification obligations |
NeuroCluster supports controls relevant to this framework. Whether a particular deployment meets a particular obligation depends on how it is configured, operated and documented, so a deployment-specific assessment remains required. Nothing on this page is legal advice.
Questions
- Which framework do you align to?
- The mechanisms are framework-neutral by design, because organisations are typically subject to several at once. We map to the specific frameworks in your scope during diligence rather than claiming a single alignment.
- Can the platform produce our documentation for us?
- It can produce a large part of the technical record — inventory, versions, evaluation results, decision evidence — as a by-product of operation. The organisational documentation and the judgements in it remain yours.
Bring us one operational problem.
You do not need a finished brief. Bring the problem — we will work out the next step together.
Or book a call with the team