GridSight · by NeuroCluster

Turn grid data into controlled action.

GridSight connects operational, asset and enterprise data through a governed grid ontology — giving AI the context, authority and evidence required to support critical grid decisions.

Not a dashboard. Not another data lake. The layer that makes the systems already running your grid answer one question together.

Built for customer-controlled, sovereign and regulated environments.

  • Runs inside your environment
  • Evidence on every answer
  • Policy before action
  • Human approval where it matters

The problem

Europe's grid doesn't have a data problem. It has a context problem.

Grid operators already generate enormous volumes of operational and enterprise data. The information required for a single decision is spread across systems that were never designed to answer a question together.

Every operator has solved the transport problem. Data flows between systems, warehouses fill, dashboards render. What no pipeline delivers is the relationship between a transformer, the line it feeds, the defect an inspector photographed last spring, the work order already raised against it and the operational policy that decides who may act.

That relationship is reassembled by hand, by an engineer, on every single decision. It is the slowest part of the work and the first thing lost when the person who held it in their head moves on.

  • SCADAWhat is happening now?
  • GISWhere is the asset?
  • SAP / EAMWhat happened before?
  • InspectionsWhat condition is it in?
  • WeatherWhat happens next?
  • Work ordersWhat are we already doing?
  • Market dataWhat external conditions matter?

Critical decisions require all of them.

Traditional integration

Traditional integration moves data.

GridSight

GridSight connects its meaning.

The magic moment

From scattered signals to one operational picture.

One question, asked two ways.

Which assets require attention before they become operational risks?

The same sources, resolved against one asset through the grid ontology.

  1. Asset identity
  2. Physical relationships
  3. Current operating state
  4. Historical maintenance
  5. Inspection evidence
  6. Environmental conditions
  7. Existing work
  8. Operational policies

One governed recommendation.

Asset risk

Transformer TR-2048

Elevated attention recommended
Evidence
7 supporting sources
Related assets
12
Open work orders
2
Policy check
Passed
Recommended next actionSchedule engineering review
Human approvalHuman approval required

Evidence

Every claim resolves to the record it came from.

Policy

The recommendation is checked against your rules before it is shown.

Human control

A qualified person decides. GridSight prepares the case.

Illustrative example. Asset identifiers and counts are shown to demonstrate the output format, not results from a deployment.

How it works

From grid data to controlled action.

Five stages. Each one is inspectable, each one is governed, and none of them require you to move your systems of record.

Operational, spatial, enterprise and external sources are connected where they live. Operational technology is read through a one-directional, rate-limited broker — typically a historian rather than the control system itself.

  • SCADA
  • GIS
  • SAP
  • EMS
  • EAM
  • IoT
  • Weather
  • Documents
  • Inspection
  • Market data

Every answer traces back to evidence.

Every action remains subject to enterprise policy.

GridSight does not issue control commands to process systems. Anything that changes the state of the network goes to a qualified operator, inside the systems and procedures already approved for that purpose.

The grid ontology

Give AI a model of the grid — not just access to its data.

Retrieval finds documents that mention a transformer. It cannot tell you which line that transformer feeds, or which other assets share its defect.

A language model can retrieve documents.

GridSight understands relationships.

Search and retrieval treat your enterprise as a pile of text. That works for questions whose answer is written down somewhere. It fails for the questions grid operators actually ask, because those answers are not written anywhere — they exist in the relationship between records held in different systems.

The ontology makes those relationships first-class. An asset has a position in the topology, a condition history, an inspection record, a risk, an owner and a policy. Reasoning becomes traversal instead of guesswork.

  1. SubstationcontainsTransformer
  2. Transformerconnected_toLine
  3. LinesuppliesRegion
  4. TransformerhasInspection
  5. InspectionidentifiesDefect
  6. DefectcreatesRisk
  7. Riskmitigated_byWork order
  8. Work ordergoverned_byPolicy
  9. PolicyrequiresApproval

The ontology becomes reusable operational context.

The first use case builds context. The second reuses it.

Every subsequent workflow becomes cheaper to deploy, because the enterprise model already exists. This is the difference between an AI project and an intelligence layer: the second one does not start from zero.

  1. 1Use case 01Builds the objects, relationships and connections it needs.
  2. 2Use case 02Reuses most of that model and extends it at the edges.
  3. 3Use case 03+Mostly configuration — the semantics are already there.

Applications

One intelligence layer. Multiple grid applications.

Three application areas over the same ontology, the same identity model and the same governance. Adding the second does not mean rebuilding the first.

GridSight Operations

Operational intelligence across grid state, events, assets and decisions.

Bring the current state of the network together with the context needed to interpret it, so an operator investigating an event is not reconstructing it from four screens.

  • Operational situation awareness
  • Event correlation
  • Topology-aware investigation
  • Operator decision support
  • Evidence-backed incident analysis

GridSight Asset Intelligence

Connect asset history, inspection, maintenance and operating conditions.

Treat condition as something assembled from every source that observes it — telemetry, inspection imagery, maintenance records and operating environment — rather than a field in one system.

  • Asset condition intelligence
  • Inspection analysis
  • Anomaly correlation
  • Maintenance prioritisation
  • Work-order intelligence
  • Evidence-based asset risk

GridSight Contingency

Contextual intelligence for network risk and contingency workflows.

Support the analysis around contingency work: what an asset relates to, what a scenario changes, which constraints bear on it, and what the evidence says.

  • N-1 analysis support
  • Asset relationship reasoning
  • Scenario comparison
  • Operational constraints
  • Evidence-backed recommendations
  • Human approval workflows

These are decision-support applications. GridSight does not independently perform protection, switching or safety-critical control, and does not replace the certified systems that do.

Asset in context

Select an asset. See everything that bears on it.

A simplified network, from generation through transmission to critical load. Choose any asset to see the operational picture GridSight assembles for it.

NominalWatchAttention

Illustrative model with example data. It demonstrates the shape of the output — asset identifiers, readings and counts are not from a live deployment.

Agents

Agents that understand the enterprise before they act.

A GridSight agent is not a chat window with grid documents behind it. It carries an identity, a mandate and a set of permissions, and it plans against the ontology.

Question

Which substations have elevated operational risk this week?

Agent plan

  1. 01Find relevant assets
  2. 02Query telemetry
  3. 03Check inspection evidence
  4. 04Retrieve maintenance history
  5. 05Check work orders
  6. 06Evaluate weather exposure
  7. 07Apply risk policy
  8. 08Generate recommendation

Control

  • Identity verified
  • Permissions checked
  • Policy passed
  • Evidence attached
  • Human approval required

Result

Recommendation, evidence and a next action — inside the workflow that owns it.

Intelligence without authority is a chatbot.

Intelligence with uncontrolled authority is a risk.

GridSight governs both.

Human in the loop

Autonomy where appropriate. Human control where required.

Autonomy is not a product setting with two positions. It is a spectrum, configured per workflow and enforced by the control plane.

  1. 01

    Observe

    AI reads and correlates information.

    Human: Informed

  2. 02

    Recommend

    AI proposes an action with its evidence.

    Human: Decides

  3. 03

    Prepare

    AI assembles the workflow or transaction.

    Human: Reviews

  4. 04

    Approve

    A qualified person validates the proposal.

    Human: Authorises

  5. 05

    Execute

    An approved system performs the permitted action.

    Human: Accountable

Configurable per

  • Workflow
  • Asset class
  • System
  • User
  • Agent
  • Risk level
  • Policy

The level that applies is a property of the workflow, not of the model. Changing model does not change what an agent is allowed to do.

Deployment

Deploy inside the environment you already control.

GridSight runs where your policies say it can run. Adopting it does not require moving data to a vendor platform or buying infrastructure from us.

Customer datacenter

Your hardware, your network, your operational control.

Private cloud

Your tenancy in the cloud you already govern.

Sovereign European cloud

Deployment in an EU-jurisdiction environment of your choosing.

Edge / OT environment

Local processing close to distributed assets.

Air-gapped

Disconnected operation with local inference.

Hybrid

Split by workload, data class or jurisdiction.

Your infrastructure. Your models. Your data. Your policies.

NeuroCluster is model-independent and infrastructure-independent. GridSight can run against customer-selected models, European models, open-weight models, private models or specialised domain models.

Owning NeuroCluster infrastructure is an option, not a prerequisite. The platform is designed to be deployed into an environment the customer already controls.

Security & governance

Built for environments where “probably safe” is not enough.

Governance is not a settings page bolted onto a model. It is the layer every request passes through before it reaches data, a tool or a workflow.

Identity & access

Every user and every agent authenticates and carries a defined scope.

Agent authority

An agent has an owner, a mandate and permissions it cannot exceed.

Policy enforcement

Rules are evaluated before an answer is produced, not audited afterwards.

Data isolation

Tenancy, classification and residency boundaries are enforced in the runtime.

Model routing controls

Which model may see which class of data is a policy decision.

Evidence lineage

Every claim retains the source it was derived from.

Audit logging

Requests, tool calls, approvals and outcomes are recorded.

Human approval

Approval gates are part of the workflow definition.

Deployment isolation

Workloads are separated by environment and by sensitivity.

Observability

Model, agent and workflow behaviour is traceable in operation.

Designed to support organisations operating under

  • GDPR

    Data-protection obligations over personal data in operational and enterprise records.

  • EU AI Act

    Governance expectations for AI systems used in regulated and high-impact settings.

  • NIS2

    Cyber-resilience and incident obligations for essential-entity operators.

  • CRA

    Product security expectations across the software supply chain.

These are architectural capabilities intended to support your compliance programme. NeuroCluster does not claim certification or formal conformity assessment against these frameworks on your behalf.

Model independence

The best model today should not become tomorrow's lock-in.

Different workloads need different models. Classification, long-context reasoning, vision over inspection imagery and local edge inference do not share one optimum.

  • Mistral
  • Llama
  • Qwen
  • Customer models
  • Specialised models
  • Future models

NeuroCluster model router

Routes by workload class, data classification and jurisdiction

GridSight

  • Performance

    Match the model to the difficulty of the workload.

  • Cost

    Route routine work to cheaper models and reserve capacity for hard problems.

  • Jurisdiction

    Keep classes of data inside an approved legal boundary.

  • Security

    Restrict sensitive context to models running under your control.

  • Latency

    Serve interactive and edge workloads locally.

  • Specialisation

    Use domain or vision models where general models underperform.

Models change.

Enterprise context persists.

GridSight separates enterprise intelligence from the model provider. Replacing a model is a routing change, not a rebuild of your ontology, policies, agents or evidence trail.

Integration

Keep the systems that already run the grid.

GridSight complements the operational and enterprise landscape. Your systems of record stay your systems of record.

Operations

  • SCADA
  • EMS
  • DMS
  • Historian

Read through a one-directional broker.

Enterprise

  • SAP
  • ERP
  • EAM
  • CRM

Remain the system of record.

Spatial

  • GIS
  • Asset maps
  • Network topology

Anchors assets in the network model.

Data

  • Databases
  • Data lakes
  • Warehouses
  • Streams

Connected where they already live.

Unstructured

  • Documents
  • Email
  • Reports
  • Manuals

Typed against objects, not filed as text.

External

  • Weather
  • Market information
  • Regulatory data
  • Geospatial sources

Context the grid does not generate itself.

System categories describe intended integration coverage. They do not imply partnership, certification or endorsement by the named vendors.

Adoption

Start with one decision. Build an intelligence layer.

The failure mode in enterprise AI is modelling everything before delivering anything. GridSight is designed to be adopted the other way around.

  1. 01

    Land

    One governed workflow, with the objects and connections it actually needs.

    A six to ten week deployment is the target where the workflow, data access and approvals are ready.

  2. 02

    Prove

    Demonstrate operational value on that workflow with evidence attached.

  3. 03

    Expand

    Add assets, workflows and data sources against the same model.

  4. 04

    Standardise

    Shared ontology and governance become reusable infrastructure.

  5. 05

    Scale

    Agents and applications operate across business units.

Every deployment compounds the value of the shared context.

The six to ten week figure is a planning target, not a contractual commitment. Actual duration depends on data access, system readiness and internal approvals.

Why NeuroCluster

Not another layer of lock-in.

Six primitives. Every GridSight capability is built from them, and so is every other application on the platform.

  • 01

    Context

    A living ontology connects enterprise meaning across systems.

  • 02

    Identity

    Every user and agent operates with defined authority.

  • 03

    Policy

    Actions remain inside organisational rules.

  • 04

    Intelligence

    Use the right model for each workload.

  • 05

    Evidence

    Decisions remain traceable to their sources.

  • 06

    Action

    Intelligence connects back into operational workflows.

ContextIdentityPolicyIntelligenceEvidenceAction

Sovereignty

Sovereignty is operational freedom.

Server location is the easiest part of sovereignty and the least useful on its own. What matters is whether you can still change your mind.

Model freedom

Change models without rebuilding the enterprise layer.

Infrastructure freedom

Change deployment environment without changing the application.

Data control

Keep sensitive data inside a boundary you define.

Identity control

Retain authority over which agents and users can do what.

Auditability

Know why a decision was made, after the fact.

Exit freedom

Avoid permanent dependence on a single AI vendor.

Sovereign by architecture, not by marketing.

Outcomes

Built around operational outcomes.

We do not publish savings percentages for deployments that have not happened. These are the categories of change GridSight is built to produce.

01

Faster investigation

Bring fragmented evidence into one operational context.

02

Better asset decisions

Connect condition, history, topology and operational state.

03

Controlled AI adoption

Introduce agents without surrendering governance.

04

Reusable context

Stop rebuilding integrations and semantics for every AI project.

05

Model optionality

Adopt better models without rebuilding the enterprise layer.

06

Auditable decisions

Preserve evidence and decision history.

For architects

Under the hood.

Optional depth. Expand what is relevant to your review.

Context & reasoning

Ontology

Typed objects, named relationships, events and rules over the grid domain. Objects resolve across source systems rather than being copied into a new master.

Graph relationships

Traversal over the object model answers impact and dependency questions without a bespoke query per question.

Vector retrieval

Semantic retrieval over documents and findings, typed against the objects they describe rather than returned as loose text.

Memory

Scoped, inspectable state across a task or an investigation, subject to the same permissions as the underlying data.

Agents & models

Agent orchestration

Agents carry an owner, a mandate, scoped permissions and an evidence trail. Plans are produced before tools are called.

MCP

Tools and data sources are exposed to agents through a declared interface, so an agent's reach is a configuration decision.

Model routing

Workload class, data classification and jurisdiction determine which model serves a request.

Private inference

Open-weight and private models served inside the customer boundary for sensitive workloads.

Control & runtime

Identity

Enterprise identity for users and first-class identity for agents, with authority defined per workflow.

Policy engine

Externalised policy evaluated at request time, covering data access, tool use and action authority.

Evidence lineage

Retained provenance from answer to source record, so a decision can be reconstructed.

Observability

Tracing across model calls, tool calls and workflow steps for operational and review purposes.

Kubernetes

The runtime is deployed as a Kubernetes workload, which is what makes the deployment options interchangeable.

Edge & air-gapped

Local processing at distributed assets and fully disconnected operation with local inference.

Platform

GridSight is where NeuroCluster starts. The Intelligence OS is where it expands.

Energy is a demanding proving ground: long-lived physical assets, real consequence, strict governance and systems that cannot be disturbed. The primitives that survive it generalise.

Applications

NeuroCluster Intelligence OS

The same primitives power every domain

  • Ontology
  • Identity
  • Policy
  • Agents
  • Evidence
  • Models
  • Workflows
  • Deployment

Adjacent areas describe where the platform architecture is designed to extend. They are directions for the platform, not shipping products with their own release schedule.

Questions

The questions that decide procurement.

Does GridSight replace our SCADA, GIS or asset management systems?
No. GridSight is an intelligence layer over the systems that already run the grid. Your asset management system stays the system of record; the ontology defines what its objects mean in relation to topology, condition, work and obligations held elsewhere.
Does anything connect directly to our control systems?
Operational technology is read through a one-directional, rate-limited broker, and usually via a historian rather than the control system itself. There is no write path from GridSight into process control.
Can GridSight perform switching or grid control?
No. GridSight is decision support. It assembles the case, checks it against policy and proposes an action. Anything that changes the state of the network goes to a qualified operator inside the systems and procedures already approved for that purpose.
Can it run without sending data outside our environment?
Yes. GridSight can be deployed in a customer datacenter, a private or sovereign cloud, at the edge, or fully air-gapped with local inference on open-weight or private models.
How long before an ontology is useful?
Useful comes from modelling one decision rather than the whole estate — typically the asset, its topology, its work history and the constraint that bears on it. Enterprise-wide modelling before a first workload reliably produces something nobody uses.
What happens when we want to change the underlying model?
Model selection is a routing decision. The ontology, policies, agent mandates and evidence trail are independent of the model provider, so replacing a model does not require rebuilding the enterprise layer.

Start with the decision that matters most.

  1. 01Choose one high-value grid workflow.
  2. 02Connect the required systems.
  3. 03Build the operational context.
  4. 04Deploy governed intelligence inside your environment.

Explore NeuroCluster

Request a GridSight demo

Tell us the decision you want to improve. We will shape the session around it.