Consistencyisthecommercialproblem
In underwriting and claims, variance between equally competent people is expensive. Making criteria explicit and reasoning recordable addresses that directly.
Whereitapplies
Underwriting support
Assembling the submission, applicable appetite and precedent, with the reasoning recorded.
Claims handling
Document extraction, coverage assessment support and consistent next-step proposals.
Document intelligence
Policy wordings, schedules, surveys and correspondence structured with citations.
Portfolio risk
Exposure and accumulation questions answered by traversal across typed objects.
Referral consistency
Making the referral threshold a rule rather than a matter of individual judgement.
Decision records
Why a risk was priced or a claim assessed as it was, retained and reviewable.
Coverage and pricing decisions remain human decisions. The platform assembles the case, applies criteria consistently and records the reasoning.
Questions
- Does this price risk automatically?
- No. It assembles what an underwriter needs and applies declared criteria consistently, recording the basis. Pricing authority stays with the underwriter and with your existing rating tools.
- How do you handle fairness concerns?
- By making criteria explicit and decisions recorded, which is a precondition for testing for bias at all. That testing is your responsibility and requires your own actuarial and legal judgement.
Continue
- Financial infrastructureThe adjacent regulated-decision pattern.
- GovernanceApprovals, evaluation and change control.
- KnowledgeDocument intelligence with citations.
- OntologyPolicies, claims and exposures as typed objects.
- EU AI ActWhere obligations may apply to insurance use cases.
- Use casesSpecific workflows and their evidence level.
Bring us one operational problem.
You do not need a finished brief. Bring the problem — we will work out the next step together.
Or book a call with the team